Sorters at the Shanghai Post Office, as mentioned in that despatch, should be assisted as recommended.
2.4. I have considered your proposal that the Postmaster General should be authorised to grant an allowance of up to £1,500 to the managers of the postal agencies in China; but I do not think that, on the facts as put forward in your despatch and its enclosures, a sufficiently strong case is made out for approaching the Imperial authorities in the matter. I shall therefore be glad if you will reconsider this question.
3. I take this opportunity of observing that I did not gather from your despatch No. 202 of the 3rd June and its enclosures what I now infer from all Lewis' minute on the case, viz. that it was not intended that the officers whose posts are printed in italics in the Classification Scheme should receive increments. I should be glad to know if I am right in drawing this inference, and, if so, on what grounds and when this decision was taken.
Sorters at the Shanghai
Pot Offin, in that despatch.
as recommended
2.4.
I have considered
Your
proposal that the
Postumaster General should
apres
be misted to ca
15
Lofthe
the mines of the to £1,500 Infurial contribution
mers respect of the fortal
agencies
in China; het
Jugut that on the facts as put forward in You desfatich and its inclous Scannot
aper that a sufficiently
stray for approaching the Imperial authorities in the matter, Ishall therefore be glad. If you will reconsider
case is made out
sus festion. Hants
ay
3.
I take this 283 bbaturity of obseming that I did not
Sather from your desfatch No. 202 of the 3rd June and Its enclosures, what I now infer from all Lewis' muite the the case, viz. that it
not intended that
مل
the officers whose posts funted in italics
ar
the Classification Scheme should recurs sricrements. I should bigled toknow if I am right in drawing this inference, and, if w what grounds. so, when A this decision was
taken. Shangh
I
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.